[specimen] Hello everybody

[James]

one very annoying bug is that specimen still doesn't support
--lash-project, so it still cant be used with lash.


On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 18:17 -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> Again, let's please release 0.5.2 and then add features. I have no
> objections to the features at all. I just feel badly about how long it's
> been with no release and don't want to start adding new bugs right now.
> 
> So, can we first fix bugs, then hack on new stuff?
> 
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 11:14:18PM +0300, Juuso Alasuutari wrote:
> > On Thursday 06 September 2007 21:44:22 Dragan Noveski wrote:
> > > James wrote:
> > > > i dare you to add per-instrument jack outputs :D
> > > hi,
> > > good news!!
> > > i am agreed with james, if it is possible, do 'per-instrument jack
> > > outputs', that would be great.
> > > i think there will be enough people to test and help you debugging?!
> > I definitely have that one in mind. Here's a brief list of the things I want 
> > to see happen:
> > - Per-channel volumes. Controller 7 should adjust the active channel's volume, 
> > not the volume of each and every patch like it does now.
> 
> I've considered this a bug and would welcome a fix for 0.5.2.
> 
> > - Patch velocity range setting. This will enable creating layered instruments.
> 
> This would be a valuable new feature for later.
> 
> > - JACK MIDI support.
> 
> I believe we already have this.
> 
> > - Flexible JACK outputs. Being able to create an arbitrary number of JACK 
> > outputs and routing any patch(es) to any port(s) should be sufficient to rock 
> > any rational person's socks off.
> 
> Sounds good in principle, but again it's a new feature for later
> 
> > - Maybe something with effects and/or envelopes.
> 
> Both are good, but also new features for later.
> 
> > I'm sure I forgot something, but I'm tired enough to not care. We'll see how 
> > well I can manage to implement all these great ideas in practice.
> 
> Thanks for your efforts! 
> 
> To be clear, I really want to see this stuff happen, but after 0.5.2.
> 
> If you want to work on a new feature before release, create a branch for
> hacking on and we'll merge stuff back to trunk after the release.
> 
> I have to apologize for my own lack of activity. At some point I
> promised a roadmap which never materialised. Maybe Juuso's activity will
> at least get me motivated to type up my ideas.
> 
> I should also say that the above are just my own opinions and I don't
> consider mine to matter more just because I'm hosting the project. 
> 
> -Eric (your humble, if often absentee, maintainer)
> 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.